CO129-056 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [6] — Page 72

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

89

71

internating at the same time that

'his Excellency has failed to prevent reference to the Supreme Government

the matters in difference.

fail

His Excellency cannot perceive that this decision places

me at a disadvantage with the Chief Justice.

I cannot institute the enquiries

which his Excellency declines to

institute; and the Chief Justice will

not. My justification is his impeachment; and those whom

I moved to the

right to

some

former

would have

refuse to

seeking to invoke them in the latter.

It is easy for the Chief Justice to frame broadly the question of "drunk or sober?"

and quite as

easy, especially from

habit

of conviviality,

men of a certain

class, whom I shall not name, to obtain

an issue so

as to secure his acquittal of the charge upon an issue so framed But it is not

so easy for me to get my

questions answered; 'did the Chief Justice misconduct himself before ladies at the Supreme table, in the presence

of all the heads of departments, and upon an

occasion

of high official ceremony?'; if so, 'what were the particular instances of misconduct? and were they such

as

the absence of the excuse of inebriety would aggravate?' and 'were the especial instances, given

Edit History

2026-05-18 02:22:49 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
89 71 internating at the same time that 'his Excellency has failed to prevent reference to the Supreme Government the matters in difference. fail His Excellency cannot perceive that this decision places me at a disadvantage with the Chief Justice. I cannot institute the enquiries which his Excellency declines to institute; and the Chief Justice will not. My justification is his impeachment; and those whom I moved to the right to some former would have refuse to seeking to invoke them in the latter. It is easy for the Chief Justice to frame broadly the question of "drunk or sober?" and quite as easy, especially from habit of conviviality, men of a certain class, whom I shall not name, to obtain an issue so as to secure his acquittal of the charge upon an issue so framed But it is not so easy for me to get my questions answered; 'did the Chief Justice misconduct himself before ladies at the Supreme table, in the presence of all the heads of departments, and upon an occasion of high official ceremony?'; if so, 'what were the particular instances of misconduct? and were they such as the absence of the excuse of inebriety would aggravate?' and 'were the especial instances, given
Baseline (Original)
89 71 internating at the came time that 'bis his recelleney has failed to prevenć reference to the Stome soremment ' a the matters in difference. fail His meeliency cannot perccive that this decision places Auc at disadvantage with the Chief Curtice. I cannot institute the enquiries A which bis receiling declines to institute; and the Shirt Justice will not. My justification is his imreachment; and those whom I moved to the right to Some former would have neeuse slue seeking to invobe them in the latter. It is easy for the Chief Justice to frame broadly the question of "arunk or sober?" and quite as مان casy, caricially from habit men of a certain of conviviality, whom I shall not name, to obtain issue so his acquittal of the charge uhon an tiene es shared But it is not me to get my imm carry thing for - questions answered; _ 'did the "Chief custice misconduct himself "before Ladies at the stremos table, in the presince all the head 'derartments, and uron an F 1 recasion of high official ceremon?"; _ if 20, "what were the particular instances 'of misconduct ? and were they such as the absence of the creus of "incbriety would aggravate?' aná "were the cxxecial instances, given
2026-05-18 02:22:49 · Baseline
View content

89

71

internating at the came time that

'bis

his recelleney has failed to prevenć reference to the Stome soremment '

a

the matters in difference.

fail

His meeliency cannot perccive that this decision places

Auc

at disadvantage with the Chief Curtice.

I

cannot institute the enquiries

A

which bis receiling declines to

institute; and the Shirt Justice will

not. My justification is his imreachment; and those whom

I moved to the

right to

Some

former

would have

neeuse slue

seeking to invobe them in the latter.

It is easy for the Chief Justice to frame broadly the question of "arunk or sober?"

and quite as

مان

casy, caricially from

habit

men of a certain

of conviviality,

whom I shall not name, to obtain

issue so

his acquittal of the charge uhon an tiene es shared But it is not

me to get my

imm

carry thing for

-

questions answered; _ 'did the "Chief custice misconduct himself "before Ladies at the stremos table, in the presince

all the head 'derartments, and uron an

F

1

recasion

of high official ceremon?"; _ if 20, "what were the particular instances 'of misconduct ? and were they such

as

the absence of the creus of "incbriety would aggravate?' aná "were the cxxecial instances, given

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.