89
71
internating at the same time that
'his Excellency has failed to prevent reference to the Supreme Government
the matters in difference.
fail
His Excellency cannot perceive that this decision places
me at a disadvantage with the Chief Justice.
I cannot institute the enquiries
which his Excellency declines to
institute; and the Chief Justice will
not. My justification is his impeachment; and those whom
I moved to the
right to
some
former
would have
refuse to
seeking to invoke them in the latter.
It is easy for the Chief Justice to frame broadly the question of "drunk or sober?"
and quite as
easy, especially from
habit
of conviviality,
men of a certain
class, whom I shall not name, to obtain
an issue so
as to secure his acquittal of the charge upon an issue so framed But it is not
so easy for me to get my
questions answered; 'did the Chief Justice misconduct himself before ladies at the Supreme table, in the presence
of all the heads of departments, and upon an
occasion
of high official ceremony?'; if so, 'what were the particular instances of misconduct? and were they such
as
the absence of the excuse of inebriety would aggravate?' and 'were the especial instances, given
89
71
internating at the came time that
'bis
his recelleney has failed to prevenć reference to the Stome soremment '
a
the matters in difference.
fail
His meeliency cannot perccive that this decision places
Auc
at disadvantage with the Chief Curtice.
I
cannot institute the enquiries
A
which bis receiling declines to
institute; and the Shirt Justice will
not. My justification is his imreachment; and those whom
I moved to the
right to
Some
former
would have
neeuse slue
seeking to invobe them in the latter.
It is easy for the Chief Justice to frame broadly the question of "arunk or sober?"
and quite as
مان
casy, caricially from
habit
men of a certain
of conviviality,
whom I shall not name, to obtain
issue so
his acquittal of the charge uhon an tiene es shared But it is not
me to get my
imm
carry thing for
-
questions answered; _ 'did the "Chief custice misconduct himself "before Ladies at the stremos table, in the presince
all the head 'derartments, and uron an
F
1
recasion
of high official ceremon?"; _ if 20, "what were the particular instances 'of misconduct ? and were they such
as
the absence of the creus of "incbriety would aggravate?' aná "were the cxxecial instances, given
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.